So this whole Global Warming / Gaia / Inconvenient Truth / Al Gore worshipping thing is just a figment of my imagination?
This is a prime example of politicized science, of which I'd imagined Einstein as being rather dismissive previously, UCANSEE2. Perhaps I should have been more specific. The revulsion is invariably directed at validating any Christian religious precept.
The faux religiosity of Gore and those like him has been cloaked with science for decades, with the acquiescence of scientists, precisely because it's hostile to the dominant religious paradigm in the dominant, nonsocialist nation of the world. This is just a logical progression, from mere avoidance, to outright advocacy in opposition. Poltical activism, in other words.
As such it's not science, despite the widespread derision of anyone in science who dared to question the so-called "consensus" up to, what, last year, when the whole charade began to publicly fall apart, due to a few brave souls within the "climate change" apparatus beginning to surreptitiously release internal communications detailing the scale of the fraud, perpetrated via ommission and/or manipulation of data?
Omission and manipulation of data ... seems this was mentioned upthread, wasn't it?