Replies

From the statements of others, it sounds like investigations would be triggered by a some obvious indication of wrong-doing, not simply by the death of a pre-born.

But that is not what the law says. I want it in writing, because I do not trust the best intentions of our government at all. Believe me, if this law passes, they will want to use it. And unless they run across another stupid chick like this one, they are going to have to find someone else to try it out on, like a mother who drank a glass of wine during her pregnancy or went skiing, etc.

Very little good can come from this law and lots of bad can. I mean really, how often does some stupid chick in her third trimester try something like this? She is the first I ever heard doing it and maybe the last.

Why do you think this law is any more open than any other law about murder? Do you think the language talking about not being allowed to kill people is written to specifically preclude investigations of every death?

As I said before. If we really want to treat the pre-born as people, just the same as the after-born, we can’t also expect that the death of the pre-born should be investigated any less than the death of the already born, simply because there are more preborn deaths.