Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
I don't know if that really means much in regards to the anomalies he found. Others found his work was sound.

If you read carefully, Sandra Ramsey Lines doesn't validate his work at all. She says "Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm." What exactly are those issues? She says, "Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document." Plainly put, she "affirms" that the authenticity of a document published on the internet can't be established. period.

77 posted on 02/24/2010 10:16:42 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: lucysmom

She also plainly affirms the “issues that Ron Polarik raises.” Those were her exact words were they not?


78 posted on 02/24/2010 10:25:30 PM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson