Then may be the violent overthrow the Constitution would be treason.
>Then may be the violent overthrow the Constitution would be treason.
Who said anything about violent?
I would surmise that they will, if anything, simply write a federal law into existence embracing whatever it is they wish to, any prohibitions in the Constitution notwithstanding (ie ignored).
As a perfect example, I illustrate it on the more local level of state constitution and [contrary] state law:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2456318/posts?page=36#36 [see the second part]