[American72]

I’m really disappointed in a lot of Freepers right now. She is NOT a truther for pete’s sake. When she says there are questions she is right. Not as to whether the .gov blew the buildings up, but questions as to why walls were built between agencies not allowing info in, other intel that wasn’t passed on, the terrorists allowed to attend flight schools, etc. I can’t believe some Freepers would actually consider voting for slick rick perry the TTC guy, forcing vaccines to our daughters, allowing illegals to get in state tuition in colleges, etc. ALL of those things he defended in the debates!!! And Kay with her wishy washy abortion answers and bailout vote, etc. Good lord, Medina is the most conservative candidate in the race. To me it’s FR that is going nuts.

Quote from Medina “I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way.”

[FTJM]

I’m really disappointed in a lot of Freepers right now. She is NOT a truther for pete’s sake. When she says there are questions she is right. Not as to whether the .gov blew the buildings up, but questions as to why walls were built between agencies not allowing info in, other intel that wasn’t passed on, the terrorists allowed to attend flight schools, etc. I can’t believe some Freepers would actually consider voting for slick rick perry the TTC guy, forcing vaccines to our daughters, allowing illegals to get in state tuition in colleges, etc. ALL of those things he defended in the debates!!! And Kay with her wishy washy abortion answers and bailout vote, etc. Good lord, Medina is the most conservative candidate in the race. To me it’s FR that is going nuts.

Quote from Medina “I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way.”

Agreed, and good post.

IMO, Medina was getting spammed and slammed here unfairly before her comments on Glenn Beck, probably from Perry supporters. It didn't work and her comments gave them want they needed. It is surprising that she scared some Freepers so much, even before her comments. My guess is that it's more about social conservativism than anything else, based on some of the comments I've seen from the morality police.

Her comments weren't good, the clarification was better. IMO, she needs to focus on the redacted portions of the 9/11 report and intelligence failures. I think she did it to hedge for her supporters who do feel that way, doesn't make it right though.