Oh, yeah. That’s it! I’m working on fear, and haven’t done just as much research as you have. Way to win my vote - not!
Where’s the testimony at the State House or Senate to get any bill passed? Show me evidence that Medina has the least notion about how to move a bill through the Texas legislature. When has she walked the halls of the Capitol or stood for hours in the lobby of the House to talk to a coalition of legislators, when has she sat up all night waiting for her chance to testify? What lobbying efforts has she supported with her time and money? When did she ever join with us Freepers on the South porch to protest the latest twitty move of the Dems?
What I see are freepers bitching about the RINOs, complaining that there needs to be no more compromises on principle, stating that the RINOs’ days are done and that Perry and KBH are RINOs at best. At the very best.
Establishment candidates. One who promised to change Washington but was instead changed by Washington.
The other...Texas vote for him then spend three years wondering why?
At least those are what the ads say.
Medina comes in with nearly the exact positions that the Conservative freepers want, but that isn’t good enough.
She lacks the experience the RINOs have and for some, although she was far clearer and less ambiguous that the RINOs, she didn’t state her positions in the most perfect absolutes to please every freepers.
Now she steps in the 911 truther excrement pile and can’t get the stench off of her whether she deserves it or not.
And, imo, that was the excuse that a lot of freepers needed to retain a ‘safe’ establishement candidate while talking about change.
I’m not trying to win votes for anyone. Just pointing out how when the time came to support a candidate with the most Conservative platform that freepers refused to do so.
In freeperland, if you can’t agree with someone then they are automatically nutcases. Or worse.