[usmcobra]

it does not say anything about children born on US soil.

It doesn't have to, only a moronic loser would dare to believe that only those children born to US citizen Parents beyond the seas were the only legal form of Natural born citizens.

Everyone else understand that in defining naturalization and Natural Born Citizen, The First US Congress wrote the law of the land as it pertains to citizenship overriding English common law of the day.

I'll be even more clear on this issue, one of the reasons that the War of 1812 was fought was because England was Pressing into the Royal Navy Natural Born US citizens, claiming they were still British Subjects because their fathers and mothers had once been English subjects before the revolution

[EnderWiggins]

"It doesn't have to, only a moronic loser would dare to believe that only those children born to US citizen Parents beyond the seas were the only legal form of Natural born citizens."

Thus proving beyond any doubt that it is not the definition for natural born citizens. Because the members of the First Congress were not moronic losers.

[Danae]

See post 702.

By Obama’s admission, he was born under the British Nationality act of 1948. he is a Natural Born Citizen of Britain. Not of the United States. The 1952 Immigration and Naturalization act makes that clear in Title III, the section scrubbed off the internet. Post 702 quotes the beginning of the passage with a link to the PDF. Download it now. This would be the next thing scrubbed.