[syc1959]

ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTIONS;

So explain how “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.”

So to ‘what’ degree was Barack Hussein Obama under US Jurisdiction at birth? Knowing that he was already under British jurisdiction, and how that being only partial or to whatever degree you impose not being in conflict with “completely subject to”?

Mind you this is The Supreme Court that has stated complete and not partial to any degree jurisdiction.

[syc1959]

This was to EnderWigings

[Las Vegas Ron]

You're confusing citizen with natural born.

Did you read the SCOTUS decisions regarding the definition of NBC?

For example:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.

U.S. Supreme Court Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)

I figure if we have a man in office hell bent on destroying this Country, I want to at least know he's in office legally, if that's a birthr than I'm a proud one.

[Las Vegas Ron]

ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTIONS;

Are you sure you are directing that to me?

When I responded earlier I thought it was to another poster.