what is being born in Hawaii have to do with BaracK Hussein Obama being a British Subject, under British Law.
It doesn’t matter, as british Law states QUOTE:
British Common Law that included Bl Com [Blackstone Commentaries] dictated that British subject could never forfeit being in the allegiance to the King regardless of place or time.
British Common Law, the British Nationality act of 1948 that covered Barack Obama Sr and that also covered his children, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Obama. Was and still is a British subject, still oweing allegiance to the Crown.
Barack Hussein Obama was and still is under the British Nationality Act of 1948, and as such no matter where he was born, he fails with any percent of foreign whatever fails as a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution.
Again, back to John Jay...”Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
So how does any foreign influence, law, citizenship, or allegiance provide that ‘strong check’.
Notice once again, they have a whole group devoted to preverting the United States Constitution, and so far haven’t come up with one valid argument, they can take into court.
Sorry, son. My neighbors were both British citizens at the time their kids were born here -- and the kids are US citizens, according to the Constitution and subsequent court rulings.
The fact that Britain also recognizes them as citizens is irrelevant to their US citizenship status.