Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins

Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy fourth edition
Under Jus Soli, the following is written “The Supreme Court’s first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.” Most Indians could not meet the test. “Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102.
It continues that Congress eventually passed legislation with the ‘Allotment Act of 1887, that conferred citizenship on many Indians.

The fact remains, the Court held, complete and sole Jurisdiction. As I have held that being born anywhere in the United States, jurisdiction is required, sole and complete, and Barack Hussein Obama was already claimed by British jurisdiction under the British Nationailty Act of 1948, and as such fails the United states Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen.


1,173 posted on 02/18/2010 12:01:59 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies ]


To: syc1959
"The fact remains, the Court held, complete and sole Jurisdiction. "

Which, as we have repeatedly seen the Court asserts is determined exclusively by location of birth.
1,176 posted on 02/18/2010 12:06:04 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies ]

To: syc1959

“The words ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ the court held, mean ‘not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.’ Most Indians could not meet the test.“

The aboriginal peoples of North America — The Great Native Indian tribes — can’t be Natural Born Citizens, however — according to wigout — a foreign national drunk from Kenya can come to America, make a baby with an American woman, and that baby can grow up to become President of the United States!

... An anti-American “President” out to destroy our country — I may add!

GGGRRRR!!! (Censored)

As professor David Yagley joked,(paraphrase)”we already lost this country once to the white man... I don’t want to see us lose it for a second time!”

Professor Yeagley is half Comanche Indian.

Some might like this article by same:

Public Enemy No. 1: Barry “Obama” Soetoro

http://www.badeagle.com/2009/09/22/public-enemy-no-1-barry-obama-soetoro/

STE=Q


1,197 posted on 02/18/2010 2:54:23 PM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson