"Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading." United States v Prudder, 424 F. 2d 1021(5thCir. 1970),cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 (1970)
Edwin Vieira, Constitutional Lawyer: "at the inauguration. . he's aware he's not a citizen, then it's a perjured oath."
Who is Obama? Really, I'm serious, who is he? Where did he come from? What is his allegience?
"Frank Chapman, a CPUSA supporter, wrote a letter to the party newspaper hailing the Illinois senator's victory in the Iowa caucuses:
"Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle. Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary 'mole,' not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through."
from: People's Weekly World (PWW), official newspaper of the Communist Party, USA..."
http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/12302/1/405
How did he get a Security Clearance? Does he have one? I repeat, to whom or what is his primary Allegience? . . .
Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, . . in the House on March 9, 1866: “I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen”
This quote bears repeating ... and repeating ...
Again think about it, no professional politician would ever allow the federal clearance process to be a gateway to office. Remember during the clearance investigation process, the investigating agency is required by law to report any illegalities it might uncover to the appropriate authorities. What modern American professional politician would put himself in such a potentially compromising position?
He likely doesn't have one. Congressmen, including US Senators, don't need them. Neither do occupants of the oval office. But no one has to tell or show them anything unless they ask, very specifically, for the information.
Very specifically indeed. :)