So how, exactly, does he benefit from confusion about his hospital of birth?
As you well know, the Hawaiian state records could have been falsified,
Any state's records can be falsified, and Hawaii's weren't any easier to falsify than any other state's. Nevertheless, they are still accepted by every court and government agency as presumptive proof of birthplace.
There's a reason for that. I will leave it as an exercise to you to figure out why.
and if it was falsified, it was most likely done by a family member's statement to the Hawaiian Department of Health in 1961.
Sure, it's possible, in the way that anything is possible.
It's just so extremely implausible as to not be taken seriously, since there is was bo motive for any of his family members to do so.
That was a mistake on someones part- the Obamas? The story line changed because they now think Obama being born at Kapiaoni hospital covers his rear end better. You discounting that the original source could not be someone in the Obama family is illogical since we don't know how the articles derived at their conclusion of Obama being born at Queens hospital.
Any state's records can be falsified, and Hawaii's weren't any easier to falsify than any other state's. Nevertheless, they are still accepted by every court and government agency as presumptive proof of birthplace.
There's a reason for that. I will leave it as an exercise to you to figure out why.
Oh, I figured it out a long time ago. You leave out Obama has never given his birth certificate or his COLB to a court of law. Obama has not proven anything.
It's just so extremely implausible as to not be taken seriously, since there is was bo motive for any of his family members to do so.
With Obama who is an incessant liar it is extremely plausible.