“Go get an education and go do the research for yourself”
What makes you think I’m unfamiliar with the case. Ask anybody: it’s NOT about natural born status. I know that much at least. Seems to have gotten past you, oh lord of research, that they explicitly avoided the issue of whether the native born are eligible for the presidency.
Kindly point me to the part of the decision that I lazily avoided wherein they indicate how the term native born was chosen to indicate he doesn’t fit the Constitutional requirements for the presidency. The excerpt you provided above does nothing of the sort.
“I have the research”
So you say, except the evidence you’ve provided so far doesn’t say what you say it does. That’s a problem.
It is obvious you are unfamiliar with the cases. You cannot quote them, do not grasp their relevance, and do not have a grasp of semantics as well as why they are important in the Law.
I produced linked referenced material, and in more than one article. Have you?