My experience has been that this is not the case. Rather, evos utilising circular reasoning assume that any challenge to their mythology constitutes "anti-science," thereby disqualifying opposing arguments on philosophical, rather than scientific, grounds.
“that any challenge to their mythology”
Why do you say it is “mythology”?
There is an awful lot of research and data for you to refute before you can make this claim. The difference between actual science and “creation science” is that the data is in plain sight for you to refute. “Creation science” is not so rigorous, to say the least.
“Creation science” is the triumph of rhetoric over reason, as your post certainly demonstrates.