“Nope... I even explain that in the post. Your fatal error is your failure to follow the logic.”
I understand “creation science” logic better than “creation science” adherents.
“You mean like climate scientists?”
They are frauds just like “Creation scientists”. They are your brothers. “creation science” seeks to cloak itself in the credibility of intellectual giants that advanced man’s body of knowledge over hundreds and thousands of years. They use lies - just like “creation science” and they call it “science” for their own aims.
“Thus your reason for the reply: to try and equate modern-day Christianity and fundamentalist Christians with killers. Ah, the toys of the temple of Darwin.”
Thus you validate my first point - you appropriate “Christianity” with “fundamentalist Christians”.
If you point is that I think that a theocracy, whether it be Christian or Muslim would result in less freedom and more death - the answer is yes. Our founding fathers thought so too.
Now we can get into it with the atheistic regimes of the 20th century if you want to talk about less freedom and more death.
Show us anything positive that any God free form of government brought to the table and I'll raise it with a Constitution of the United States and Declaration of Independence that Christianity brought.
Don't forget either what great friends of science any atheistic regime is. Compared to say, Protestant Christian Europe and the United States for the last 500 years.
Tell me were the most freedom of thought, research, and technological progress has been made.