Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
I wouldn't consider either Madison or Adams bad presidents. For that era, though they weren't necessarily standouts among the great presidents (Washington, Jefferson, Monroe).

But your theory sure holds once college-educated presidents became the norm.

I get a particular chuckle over Columbia-- BO was the only one to finish; even the two Roosevelts had the sense to withdraw from that den of pinheads!

12 posted on 12/03/2009 8:33:35 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Well, IIRC, Adams and Madison were both one-termers. Adams, again, IIRC, gave us Chief Justice Marshall, who removed any doubt there might have been about the supreme complete and final power of the SCOTUS. He also gave us the alien and sedition acts, which are historically ignominious. Madison as president flip flopped on the national bank (was against it before he was for it) and flip flopped on standing army (against it, then for it) and I would say having the White House burned to the ground during your term in office is not exactly a benchmark of excellence :-)

Adams was a bad president because he was a big gubmint Federalist. Madison was simply a weak executive. h

15 posted on 12/03/2009 10:15:59 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson