Of course, I do. Because I take responsibility for not knowing about the laws in my state. You wrote letters AFTER THE FACT. Did you make sure the law in your state only allowed eligible candidates on the ballot? Did you try to write laws requiring anyone to vet the candidate? I hold all of us responsible. Sure, we acted AFTER THE FACT to try to prevent BO’s election based on questions as to his Constitutional eligibility. But the time to stop him was years ago, when we could have enacted laws that would have prevented this. But we did not know that no laws require such vetting. (Presumably, if we did, we would have written such laws.) And I hold everyone else as responsible for his election, as I do myself.
You have not been here long enough to follow what we discussed on this matter. Bill and Hill were the first official “birthers” with the PUMA.com gals pushing the issue being mad as hell, but we were saying that long before. Philip Berg’s lawsuit was followed and discussed in details with the help of americasright.com. I debated many people in Miami Herald’s blog on the eligibility, even some stupid Kenyan in Norway was into the mix. We were not asleep here F.R.!!!
Well the lame stream media sure as H made a huge fuss over the fact that they did NOT think that the Republican Party had thoroughly “vetted” Sarah Palin. What I am hearing here is a contorted bunch of B.S.!! CO
I fully agree. The problem here is that nobody expected that an usurper, and the DNC, would anticipate in such a voter fraud.
In the same way that a very few could visioned that 19 Arab hijackers, educated in American’s flight schools would use commercial airliners as explosive missiles to level the WTC and attack Pentagon and the Capitol???