The guy is a monarchist. Hardly worth debating him.
Certainly, there's no point debating him without knowing the premises that go into what passes for his "argument".
For instance, let's revisit this rather astonishing statement:
Our Lord is not a free marketer.In order to even understand where this notion came from, one would need to find and study the version of the Bible in which Jesus told of how the servants who doubled their master's money were cast into the outer darkness. It certainly does not follow from the traditional version, in which the story comes out quite the opposite.