Posted on 11/07/2009 8:27:04 PM PST by Gordon Greene
Cao will try to switch to the Dem party ala Specter once he is challenged in next year’s primary. He is a dead man walking.
The guy voted twice against the stimulus bill. He's already faced down a recall effort.
GOP Congressman Joseph Ahn Cao barely won last year in a congressional “district made up of 65% African Americans and 85% Democrats.” And now he is facing the threat of a recall because he voted twice “against President Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package as part of the Republican Party attempt to block the passage of bill,” according to the Little Saigon Insider blog.The recall campaign against Cao has already collected over 12,000 signatures in its first week. “Rev. Toris Young, President of the Louisiana Ministerial Alliance of Churches for All Peoples, has joined with his fellow Minister Aubry Wallace to attempt to obtain the verified signatures of more than 101,000 registered voters in the 2nd District, more than a third of the registered electorate, in just 180 days,” according to the Bayou Buzz.
One of the ministers involved in the recall explained why he is opposed to Cao:
Since the 2nd District voted for Obama in a landslide, and Cao openly opposed the President, Young argues that the Congressman should be removed from office immediately, not in two years when the regular elective cycle comes again. “The time for change Is now! We have so many things that still are suffering–such as Education, Health Care, Roads Repair, Flood Protection, Foreclosure, Lending, and the list goes on.” By voting against Obama now, Cao endangered the needs of his district, so the Reverend reasons.Even if this recall fails, it will galvanize voters against Cao. In short, he is toast.
This is like waiting for divine intervention. I won't hold my breath...
It's unlikely he'll win re-election because he's seen as a "right-winger" in the eyes of those liberals. We conservatives may actually do this guy a favor by publically going against him. Best to ignore him but make sure he gets no money from the republican party.
Blacks don't vote for blacks who support conservative positions. It's not just affinity voting - it's specific government programs designed to favor blacks at the expense of everyone else. Most working blacks benefit from affirmative action education, hiring and contracting policies. And the portion of the black population that doesn't want to work benefits from cradle-to-grave welfare policies that provide free housing, medical care, food and spending money. Republicans endanger all of these things. The question isn't why a black person would vote Democratic - it's why wouldn't he?
Cao’s political career in his district is going to be short. He should man up, and do what is right. He may represent people who need government oppression more than they need liberty, but that doesn’t mean he can’t rise above that ignorance. He may even be able to help a few others overcome their dependency on government.
Apparently it's a stench he misses.
Bat dau hien nay, khi toi nghe ten Cao, toi se nghi ve chu “ia dun.” Truoc hien nay, toi da nghi Cao la mot nguoi tot nhu Bobby Jindal nhung bay gio, toi biet Cao la mot nguoi cong san. Bo/Me Con Cao buon lam!
Toi noi, du con Cao!
well, what you say is true. but there are a few blacks who will vote Republican, about 5 percent.
Why would any white male vote Democrat ? You are voting to be discriminated against in terms of Affirmative Action.
Republicans won’t touch this issue. . McCain never mentioned Affirmative Action once. . haven’t heard Sarah Palin raise it either. The word that comes to mind is cowardice, but maybe I am wrong.
He should go back to Vietnam and live entirely with Communists. Screw these people.
My guess is that about 30 percent of blacks voted for michael Steele for Senate in Maryland, and about 51 of whites did as well.
Most South Vietnamese who came here are grateful and patriotic. Mr. Cao must surely have forgotten his history.
Cao is under the delusion that he can somehow retain that seat. it went 75 percent for Obama last year.
A segment of the non-black population also gets welfare benefits, which are persistently threatened by the GOP. No-blacks also benefit from unionization which, again, is continually under GOP assault. The difficulty the GOP faces is the fact that Democrats are the Santa Claus party. Dems will take from the smallest possible constituency to give to the largest possible constituency. And society's indoctrinators - teachers and the media - are mostly in the Democratic camp. How do you fight against that? It's uphill all the way. There are limits though. Past a certain level of taxation and disorder, the people being milked finally vote their interests. But it remains vaguely disreputable to do so thanks to the relentless quasi-religious left-wing propaganda barrage from educators and the self-appointed media elites.
The Santa Claus Party? They are the Scrooge Party when it comes to whites trying to get into a good college or get a good job in industry or academia or government.
When is Sarah going to bring it up ???
I can’t believe that if his was THE swing, decisive vote, that he would have voted for the bill. He obviously waited till the very end, and then got the OK from Boehner and Cantor to vote for the bill, after passage was assured..to hopefully help him in his reelection. This si the problem. That’s why, if and when we do retake the House, Boehner has got to got. I want NEW BLOOD, not the same old deal cutting polls..people willong to stand for something. Letting Cao vote this way makes a travestry of everything that Boehner and Cantor said..Principals do matter,a nd I want to see some from the GOP leadership..
this guy has voted RIGHT an most things.....
College-wise, relative to academic results, whites apparently are about where they should be. The number of Asian American students admitted is being held down so that more members of other ethnicities can be let in:
In the absence of affirmative action laws, admission rates at public universities have risen for Asian-American students, while numbers for white, black and Hispanic students have declined, according to a recent study.Peter Kirsanow noted this in a National Review article:The study, released by the University of California at Los Angeles last week, also found that across all races, the male population drops in schools with blind admissions processes.
The study tracked admission statistics for selective public universities in three of the nation's four most populous states - California, Florida and Texas. These states have not had affirmative action in college admissions since 1999.
"What we were doing was taking a look at three states that had felt the effects of banning affirmative action," said study co-author David Colburn, professor emeritus and provost emeritus at the University of Florida. "We wanted to see how it all played out."
Many college administrators do not hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. In the Wonderland that is the campus-diversity industry, individuals from some racial/ethnic groups are more equal than others. And any rational attempt to discern how colleges separate the favored from the disfavored is a lesson in caprice, bias, and subjectivity — the supreme triumvirate of unequal treatment.The racial-preference regime favors some — but not all — minority groups: Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans, yes; Asian Americans, no. Indeed, were Asian-American students not discriminated against in the college-admissions process, they would constitute the largest minority group, if not an outright majority, at many schools. As Peter Schmidt noted in the June 6, 2003, Chronicle of Higher Education, the percentage of Asian-American applicants granted admission at the University of Texas-Austin rose from 68 percent to 81 percent immediately after the Hopwood decision struck down race-based admissions policies in the Fifth Circuit. The New York Times reported (February 2, 2003) that after California's Proposition 209 ended race-based admissions, the percentage of Asian-American freshmen at Berkeley rose a full 6 percent.
Asian Americans, though only 4 percent of the nation's population, account for nearly 20 percent of all medical students. Forty-five percent of Berkeley's freshman class, but only 12 percent of California's populace, consists of Asian-Americans. And at UT-Austin, 18 percent of the freshman class is Asian American, compared to 3 percent for the state.
This "over-representation" has produced much consternation among elites who view racial preferences as the best mechanism for ensuring the "proper" racial mix on college campuses. President Clinton worried that, without preferences, "there are universities in California that could fill their entire freshman classes with nothing but Asian-Americans."
His vote wasn’t the deciding vote, and if he had voted against it, his chances of getting re-elected next year would be even slimmer than they are now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.