Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
"To date, EVERYBODY in Congress has essentially dismissed the issue. To actually write a formal letter requesting the release, and then to get either a no response or a denial will definitely be political ammo that they would use, IMHO of course."

ALL of them have broken their oath of office from article Six...

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

They are COMMANDED to follow the instructions of section three in the Twentieth amendment:

”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Congress, since it is responsible for naming a replacement President MUST be made aware that it needs to do so or not do so. Otherwise, how would it know whether or not to do so? They name a replacement if one of two things occur, the death of a President elect or the "failure to qualify" by a President elect. In order to establish whether or not a President elect has "qualified", Congress must see PROOF of qualifications. The burden of submitting this is squarely upon the President elect. Anyone serving in Congress has the legal standing to DEMAND to see this "proof" as they are required to do so in the Constitution. They don't need to "beg".

Not enforcing section three of the Twentieth amendment is equal to not supporting the Constitution. They are breaking their oath if they don't enforce it. Unfortunately, they all are guilty. That's why I recommend the states take this matter into their own hands by passing a "Usurper Protection Law".

29 posted on 11/05/2009 4:38:18 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Sham

Your post #29 speaks VOLUMES as to the state of the country. Certain States are good but others are absolutely as useless as tits on a boar. You know, I know it. I firmly believe that Courts, if they were NOT corrupt, would readily deal with this issue. After all, these judges swear to UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. So why ARE’NT THEY??? Needs an answer. WHO is threatening them or holding them hostage?? What do THEY have to hide? Even personally?? This is dirty diryt stuff but oh so necessary to expose for the absolute sake of the Republic. Otherwise, bend over, and kiss your ass, as a country, good-bye. It pains me to say this because of all of my American relatives but they feel the same way as I am expressing. They want a Revolution NOW. CO


43 posted on 11/05/2009 8:20:42 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson