It seems like that is what the article is saying (if you read past the first couple of paragraphs).. it is saying there is no logical reason why Obama dosn’t release his birth certificate. It sounds like a lot of freepers. I’m curious why the zot calls unless people aren’t reading.
You are correct in that there is a lot of detailed info there quoting a lot of sources to include Polriks, etc.
Here’s just one quote:
But whether it is called (as it was last year) a Certification or (as it is now) a Certificate of Live Birth this abbreviated document provides none of the probative information that was or wasnt on Barack Obamas original Certificate of Live Birth. Unlike the Certificate of Live Birth of the time when Barack Obama was born, this new Certificate of Live Birth provides no real evidence of where a child was born or indication of where such evidence might be found. It provides no information that would demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat. (As is permitted under Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii.)
After reading the entire report (rather than merely scanning the abstract), it seems the investigator is on the side of the American people and the Constitution.
Memo to Obambi: Trot out the verifiable documentation.
He cant produce one because one doesnt exist. Anyone with an ounce of common sense came to that conclusion long ago.
This is not a zot article
Sigh. I was hoping for some new information instead of a rehash of stuff that has apparently gone nowhere.