Replies

From the link: FACT: The credit card matter is old news. Ms. Malkin discussed the credit card matter both in her book and in her blog. Ms. MonCrief addressed it at length when Laura Ingraham interviewed her last October and wrote about it when she started her own blog (www.anitamoncreif.blospot.com) last November. I reported on it in "The Education of ACORN Whistleblower Anita Moncrief" (March 3, 2009). Ms. Malkin put it in context in "Project Vote sues whistleblower: ObamACORN bully tactics exposed" (July 22, 2009), as follows: "MonCrief has always been open and honest about her firing from Project Vote. The ObamACORN mob used the credit card incident as a pretext then and they are using it as a pretext now. The real reason they are going after her is because she poses a fundamental threat to ACORN’s criminal racket."

That pretty much answers the charges here. As far as I'm concerned, nothing further from this source warrants interest. He's an ACORN apologist.

Why don’t you take a look at Gaynor’s list of articles. He writes four days a week about Moncrief. It’s not up to Gaynor to decide when this is to be disclosed. Malkin has disclosed the credit card a couple times and yet calls Moncrief a whistle blower everytime. If I didn’t read her book or don’t read her blog regularly, then I don’t know the whole story. That’s why you disclose it every time because you don’t know who is reading what you are writing.

If you all are now going to use Gaynor as some sort of beacon that’s hilarious. This guy wrote a piece in which he cut and pasted comments from Big Government in praise of Moncrief. That was the whole piece. He’s done nothing but write glowingly about Moncrief since April.