Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

If you don’t think that her stealing and misusing a credit card from the very place she now accuses of wrongdoing is pertinent, then I can’t help you. That’s incredibly vital. It’s the main reason why outside of Malkin almost no one will speak to her. It’s why Beck and no one on Fox News will have her on. It’s not only pertinent but it goes directly to her credibility. It’s not as though Malkin doesn’t say Moncrief’s favorite color. She doesn’t mention that the person accusing Project Vote of wrongdoing before they “discovered” the wrongdoing, first they applied falsely for a credit card, then used it for personal items, then had Project Vote fire them, then they turned around and accused Project Vote of wrong doing. That paints a much different picture than saying Anita Moncrief is a whistle blower.


29 posted on 10/24/2009 9:34:41 AM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: fiscon1
If you don’t think that her stealing and misusing a credit card from the very place she now accuses of wrongdoing is pertinent, then I can’t help you.

No,the issue is that you are such a jealous idiot that you try to draw moral equivalence between that and the wrongdoings of the Obama Admin. That's no my words. That's yours. And given your admission that Malkin won't publish you on Hot Air, it reveals what you are about. Petty jealousy.

That’s incredibly vital. It’s the main reason why outside of Malkin almost no one will speak to her. It’s why Beck and no one on Fox News will have her on.

Funny, I did a Google search, and without even trying I found that she was on Hannity bac in September. Here's a hint - lying about someone in your blogs is a far worse journalistic offense than what you are complaining about with Malkin.

She doesn’t mention that the person accusing Project Vote of wrongdoing before they “discovered” the wrongdoing, first they applied falsely for a credit card, then used it for personal items, then had Project Vote fire them, then they turned around and accused Project Vote of wrong doing. That paints a much different picture than saying Anita Moncrief is a whistle blower.

So tell us, then - when a mobster turns states evidence, does that mean his testimony is worthless?

Using your logic, it would be.

Here's a hint - instead of trying to make yourself look bigger by attacking Malkin and Ed Morrisey, make yourself better instead. Trust me, you have a long, long, long ways to go to reach that point, so you'd better get started.

32 posted on 10/24/2009 9:43:03 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson