Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
"It bound the Senators not to oppose McCain's electoral votes when they came before the Congress, and that is pretty binding."

It did no such thing. But that's not the point.

"SR511 disagrees with you. It incorporates Vattel's and Bingham's definition of "natural born citizen"."

No it did not. There is no such reference in it, and it doesn't create any definition at all. You are misreading it.

64 posted on 10/07/2009 10:26:55 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
It did no such thing. But that's not the point.

It did too and that is the point. It was a determination aka decision aka resolution based upon the stated facts -- one of which was that he was born of "American citizens" [plural].

There is no such reference

Baloney, their use of the term "natural born citizen" follows the same meaning of the phrase as used by Vattel and Bingham.

it doesn't create any definition at all.

And why should it create anything??? It simply used the same old standard historical definition used by Vattel and Bingham that the Founding Fathers understood when they penned the words into the Constitution.

66 posted on 10/07/2009 11:09:02 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson