She was incisive, as usual. My only complaint is that the issue of “voter-fraud” was treated almost in passing. ACORN argues, and most of the media seem to agree, that registering individuals (who may or may not exist) doesn’t constitute actual voter-fraud. And while such “registrations,” part of Alinsky’s system-overwhelming, may be something shy of illegal, when are we going to hear about investigations of voter registry books? Is Nevada, e.g., comparing ACORN-solicited registrations to the sign-in sheets at polling sites? How do states differ in their voter-identification requirements? Were “easy” states targeted for heavy ACORN activity? How do “voter-suppression” suits match up to ACORN-targeted states? And so much more.
Sure, ACORN’s in trouble; but how are we keeping other nuts out of the system?