I’m totally speculating here .. but it appears the gist of the question was .. and likely for the first time in their ongoing correspondence .. the concept of the possibility of there being an ‘amended’ bc, so TerriK raised the issue.
I’m speculating that since there are such documents as in adoptions, it was her method of seeking another bit of information, another clue .. and if they would respond either in the positive or negative, it would impart another thread in the tapestry of facts.
~~~
“From: [TerriK - real name and email redacted]
Date: July 27, 2009 7:20:20 AM EDT
To: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov
Subject: Your help is appreciated.
Dear Ms. Okubo,
Can the State of Hawaii verify that they have the Amended (Original) birth record for President Barack Obama on file in accordance with state policies, whether digital, paper or otherwise?
Thank you and I apologize for your trouble in asking–I can’t imagine how this issue must be overwhelming you. You have been extremely patient and professional from what I can discern. But, I feel the best thing for me, is just to ask you guys myself.
Thank you again…
~~~~
Whereupon the scripted press release rely was the response.
Thanks for the clarification. It appears that the law is pretty clear(in that she is going to have to release the info according to the statute that Ms. Tickly dug up). Obama’s compulsive lying is becoming more and more apparent everyday(Ayers wrote his stupid books,etc.). Pretty soon even the ‘after-birthers’ are going to have to admit that he is hiding(lying about) something pretty big surrounding his ‘immaculate conception’ and birth. I pray every night that someone can get to the bottom of it all so we can impeach this man before he destroys our country!
Thus, the logical conclusion would be that Hawaii DID confirm that TerriK was correct: AMENDED record(s)