[fanfan]

Hawaii didn't deny possession of “amended” records for Obama. Which implies that they do have “amended” records for Obama.

---

[snip]
OIP STAFF ATTORNEY LINDEN JOESTING ISSUED MULTIPLE CONFIRMATIONS THAT THE DoH WAS REQUIRED TO INFORM TerriK IF THEY DID NOT MAINTAIN THE RECORDS SHE REQUESTED.
[snip]
But the DoH never said that amended records didn’t exist in their files. They did, however, deny access to those records and that means the records must be in their possession.
[snip]
Part 2 of the TerriK investigation report concludes with Joestling’s official OIP response to TerriK’s appeal:

---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2345143/posts?page=465#465

[STARWISE]

OK ... click!

Thanks .. ;)

[curiosity]

Hawaii didn't deny possession of “amended” records for Obama. Which implies that they do have “amended” records for Obama.

Your conclusion does not follow from the premise. Someone needs a course in basic logic, I see.