Yep.
And that’s how I saw it. Part II details the second time that the existence of amended records was confirmed. Reread Part II under the light of ‘Foreshadowing.’
=)
Exactly, and this is why Leo posted the "Foreshadowing" article to bring it back to all his readers attention. Have it in the front of their minds when reading Part III.
God Bless You & Leo for keeping the investigative fire burning.
Oh .. so you DO think it was an implicit confirmation ?
Whoa ..