Gang, I am a little confused right now. Initially Leo said Okubo and Fukino were guilty of not informing TerriK that she had the right to “appeal” her case and it was the duty of the DoH to state this in their reply to Miss Tickly (AKA TerriK). Then yesterday, John Charlton sent a threatening message to Okubo and cc’d EVERYONE in the Health Dept regarding Leo’s newly discovered statute 338-18(d) which affords the petitioner the right to obtain ‘index’ data, per the new interpretation of this statute, which request MUST be sent to the petitioner upon request.
Now, it seems that OIP Attorney Linden Joesting, with whom I’ve exchanged e-mails with and, per Miss Tickly, is one of the few cooperative attorneys at the State level, is stating:
“I regret we cannot help you further.”
Whatever happened to the State taking disciplinary action against Obama’s two little pawn girls (Fukino and Okubo) ?
Whatever happened to the 338-18 (d) case that was purportedly going to be a legal means of obtaining ‘something’ from Obama’s files ???
If anyone has any explanations, I would GREATLY appreciate receiving an answer.
If the answer is just sit tight until PART III of Leo’s investigation, I’ll live with that, but I thought we were ready to proceed with legally supported accusations regarding the State neglecting to inform Miss Tickly of her right to appeal in addition to 338-18 (D) and NEITHER of those two avenues of recourse were even mentioned in this PART II.
Please excuse the frustration. I GREATLY admire and respect Leo and Miss Tickly for their efforts, but I thought we were “getting warmer” ! Thx for your time.
There is more coming! :)
There is some CYA going on. And the State of Hawaii has reason to be trying to cover its ass. I don’t know what that reason is yet, but its pretty obvious they are doing just that. CYA on a fairly large scale.
There is more to come! :)