Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FTJM

Nope. Not even remotely.

THe state can answer with one of four responses:

From Leo’s site:

1. the agency has the record and will provide it to you

2. the agency does not maintain/possess the record

3. the agency has the record but you are denied access to it

4. the agency needs more information from you to understand your request

The DoH and OIP Eventually answered with # 3 but it took a while to force that answer. Mostly because it forced the state to statutorily ADMIT they have them! They really didn’t even want to do that.

It gets really interesting from here on out, because at that point in the investigation Terry wasn’t done with her questions! :)


50 posted on 09/27/2009 3:34:54 PM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

I think you missed the point of my comment. It’s asinine that the State is potentially hiding behind an inability to transfer information into electronic format. That’s the loophole in the statute that they hide behind.


58 posted on 09/27/2009 4:31:02 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson