Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

I hope this line of attack by Leo works.

But it is not clear to me that the OIP is going to enforce the UIPA requests. Then this can go to a court. But why should we think that a judge will even hear the case.

SCOTUS has refused to address the NBC issue directly when they know that there is real question.

Obama appears to be above the law.


30 posted on 09/27/2009 11:33:04 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lundy_s Lane II

I think Leo has said that the state statutes specifically say the documents have to be released. I wonder if he just gets the changes or the full file. Also can the state redact the files with a black magic marker.


31 posted on 09/27/2009 11:47:16 AM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Lundy_s Lane II

The state has to. Its the law. It cannot be used as both sword and shield as Terry put it. A lawyer for a company can’t say well this other company is guilty of XYZ but I can’t release the information that proves it because of attorney client privilege, you just have to trust me on that. That sort of thing does not fly with the courts.


32 posted on 09/27/2009 11:50:10 AM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson