WTF ??? WTFU!!! LOL
Your prescription is one for republican devolution meaning if republicans always win no matter what as you desire, they will always get worse. You could see it from 1995 to 2006.
RE :”..who had the cojones to stand up and speak out against the liberal domestic spending habits of Bush and the GOP Congress. “
You actually think republicans would have won elections by building roads and bridges in Iraq but telling the voter “Sorry, no pork for you” ?? You are clueless, turn off talk radio and think for yourself.
RE :”We also warned the FR Bushie Brigade..”
LOL, I warned here that republicans would be slaughtered if Bush stayed in office after 2006 AND that after a huge democrat win in 2008 there would be a backlash against democrats and....guess what?? Your warnings were dumb. Rove advised Handouts got Bush re-elected in 2004 but by late 2006 when it all backfired nothing could safe Bush or republicans if Bush stayed in. Pay now or pay more later.
Again, WTF are you talking about? That makes no sense whatsoever. Try again.
>>>>>You actually think republicans would have won elections by building roads and bridges in Iraq but telling the voter “Sorry, no pork for you” ?? You are clueless, turn off talk radio and think for yourself.
So, you like Bush`s liberal spending. Is that what your saying? If it is, you're no better than Bush.
>>>>>LOL, I warned here that republicans would be slaughtered if Bush stayed in office after 2006 AND that after a huge democrat win in 2008 there would be a backlash against democrats and....guess what?? Your warnings were dumb. Rove advised Handouts got Bush re-elected in 2004 but by late 2006 when it all backfired nothing could safe Bush or republicans if Bush stayed in. Pay now or pay more later.
So, what are you saying now? You expected Bush to resign from office in 2006? Talk about dumb. Just what is your agenda? You don't sound like a conservative. You sound like an angry militant. Mad at the world! A real mad hatter! LOL