But she only claimed to have his “vital records”.
Not her first statement. She claimed to have the original birth certificate, but gave no indication as what it said or if it matched the COLB. NADA
IN the second statement she made in July 09, but the one she made in October 08, said she'd seen his "original birth certificate". But in that context, the latest "amended" one is considered the original. Original doesn't mean "first" it means "the real document" not a copy or abstract. He could get a copy of that one, but it would take a court order to unseal an earlier one.