Here is how Sinclair titled his update:
“Court Clerk Confirms He Spoke With “Acquaintance” not Capt Rhodes on Faxing Letter
Can you please change the title to the original
That subtitle was NOT on Larry Sinclair’s page when I posted this.
Mr. Frost also stated that “if the Court does not receive an original from Iraq then there may be a problem.”
This is just plain wierd. It is obvious, and admitted that Connie Rhoades did not type this letter or sign it. It is admitted that it was done by another person, and faxed by another person, on the SAME day she was still in the United States. In fact, she could have called Orly Taitz from the base, which she did not do, she could have typed the letter from the base, signed it, and faxed it from the base, which she did not do, and did so based on a phone call, to the clerks office, which may or may not have happened, and was ACCEPTED in a US Courthouse, on what could only have been called heresay, as there is no confirmation that it is the expressed wishes of Connie Rhoades. So cannot be acted on UNTIL it is confirmed that it is indeed her wishes. You cannot just capriciously charge ahead until that time.
Secondly there is nothing in that letter that says it is being typed on behalf of Connie Rhodes, it implies forgery with a cut-n-paste signature as well. This is not a valid document, and will be cut to shreds in court should it attempt to masquerade as an actual document.
The person perpetrating the fraud, did so without the Judges permission, and the court clerk overstepped his/her authority to authorize forgery, and should be in trouble, IMO.