There WAS NOT A SUBTITLE posted on Larry’s site when I posted this article on FR. Since there wasn’t a title, I had to write one. The gist of the update at Larry Sinclair’s blog is that the court is satisfied that the faxed letter from CPT Rhodes is authentic and not a forgery.
Now you’re just mincing words to pick a fight because you don’t like the information presented.
I don’t like or dislike the information. But you are jumping to conclusions in your title that Sinclair does not support.
Did the acquaintance forge the doc on Rhode’s behalf or did he just fax something Rhodes gave him? Do we know that this person is really an acquaintance following Rhode’s request? Did the court contact Rhodes to verify? I’m sure her cell phone was working on friday. Is that signature even Rhode’s? It doesn’t look like it. And even if it was, is a cut and paste even legal? Lots more questions than answers that you seem to have conjured up in your mind.
Time will tell.