Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh

I don’t think Laura would hold the slot. Not that I disagree with her but her voice is one that some can only listen to for short spurts. I like when she fills in but I would not tune her in daily. Michele Maulkin is more articulate and to the point. I think she would be great.


24 posted on 09/15/2009 10:18:47 PM PDT by celtic gal (My Mob name is" Molly Maguire" per Hannity...we all need mob names !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: celtic gal

“I don’t think Laura would hold the slot. Not that I disagree with her but her voice is one that some can only listen to for short spurts. I like when she fills in but I would not tune her in daily. Michele Maulkin is more articulate and to the point. I think she would be great.”

I agree with you on her voice.

Michele would be better.


33 posted on 09/15/2009 10:27:35 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: celtic gal

I also found that Laura’s voice doesn’t carry well when she has two other people in at the same time. Her voice gets muddled in with the others, especially when the other two are going after each other. I think radio is her medium, and she should stick to it. The occasional TV spot is fine, but not as her major gig.


88 posted on 09/16/2009 9:29:07 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson