Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JSDude1

I favor an open system, to enable the voice of the independent, that is not winner take all. Also, I think the states that failed to deliver in the prior election should lose a portion of their delegates. It is rediculous to allow solid democratic states like NY, Mass, and California to have such a large influence on the ultimate candidate.


17 posted on 09/04/2009 3:09:39 PM PDT by snap54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: snap54

What if we lined up all the states from smallest to largest, in terms of electoral votes, and had primaries every Tuesday beginning in March for 25 weeks.

The first Tuesday would be the 2 smallest states, then every week the next 2 until almost close to the convention, where New York and California could be the last 2.

It would make for a true buildup of support for the best candidate. Maybe there would be 3 or 4 candidates at the end who would still have a shot.

Maybe it could help keep the candidate with monstrous war chest from “buying” the nomination.

What do you think?


18 posted on 09/04/2009 3:50:09 PM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 ("Super" Tuesdays produce false results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson