You might want to actually read that site. Nothing in there talks about a U.S. law that prevents dual citizenship.
In this link you will see that Obama divorced in 1963, and Married Lolo Soetero and moved to Indonesia in 1966-1967, Following his enrollment at the private Assisi school, Obama attended public schooling in Indonesia until he returned to Hawaii at age 10. He was 5. But its not when he started school, its when he was adopted.
And when was he adopted? Soetoro and Obama's mother lived in the U.S. until 1967.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_president_have_dual_citizenship
Wikianswers? You are aware that right after the answer that said a person with dual citizenship cannot be president, there is a second answer that says they can? In any event, I asked for the clause in the Constitution, the federal law, or the Supreme Court decision that supported your claim and you offer wikianswers. Birther logic.
I have already supplied a link in this reply that states he was adopted by Lolo Soetero, that is not a nick-name, it is his legal name...c’mon man...don’t you research at all?
You supply a link that states he was adopted. I posted a link that says it wouldn't have made him a citizen. What you don't post is any proof he was adopted. That's the problem with you Birthers, you're great on claims and short on evidence.
That is the birth certificate entered into court records by Orly Taits, which will be heard August 8,2009
Actually no it won't. That forged certificate was tossed out; what they will be hearing Tuesday is a motion to appeal the judges order and to recuse the judge that refused to allow the certificate to be entered. And you accuse me of not doing research.
Each of these answers was readily available on the net. Next time, do your own homework.
But it's so much more fun to watch you try to explain all the holes in your tales. A whole lot of claims. No evidence.
I think I have you figured out N-S, I spent quite a bit of time researching answers to your statements, questions, and lined the all out for you. You next step is to question sites, regardless of their content, or deny its there.
I am quite sure you can google as well as anyone here, and you can also accept or disagree with those findings. I will give you enough information, as I did with the reply to find it yourself, but I won’t do your investigation for you. It is easily found. Do your own homework.