And you are still a loyal little Birther. Look, all I was doing was pointing out that the point that Donofrio's latest legal gem was making has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on a number of occasions.
So how to you explain all the previous court decisions? That University group found Barry v. Mercein where that judge explictly states that foreign born children follow the nationality of the father. Just because another justice decided we followed English common law doesn’t make it true. The other justice closest to the framer’s time says we did not follow English common law. That’s the point of the article, dummy. They are historical documents which show exactly where the break was done. They are saying it’s unconstitutional what was done and proving it better than you are. Where’s your proof the framers adopted the jus soli plan? Justice Story says we didn’t. The earliest historians that University dug up says we didn’t. Where is your proof?