Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

I dont have to show you where it is defined. The Court should rule on the definition of the term at the time of the adoption of our Constitution and it hasn’t as of yet. Your case did not address the requirements for POTUS under the Constitution at all.


35 posted on 08/03/2009 10:10:39 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf
I dont have to show you where it is defined.

You do if you don't believe the definition provided by the justices in the Ark case.

42 posted on 08/03/2009 10:17:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson