Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

Look, you are illustrating my point by refusing to agree to raise the SS age no matter what scenario I propose about other people’s government benefits. No matter what I come up with, you’re going to say, “Let’s focus on XYZ” or “What about ABC?”

You are part of the problem!


46 posted on 07/26/2009 7:00:42 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: utahagen

I did not say I would not consider it.

But before we push out the date of retirement (social security benefits), fairness dictates that we push out the date of government bureaucrats’ retirement - bigtime.

Let’s do that - which you do not want to agree to - first.

Then we can talk about pushing back the SS date from 65.

Otherwise you will have people being forced - in the private sector - to work longer just so that government bureaucrats can retire at age 50.

THAT is not fair nor just.


47 posted on 07/26/2009 7:08:11 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson