Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler

So The Marxist Onada continues to play now you see it, now you don’t with the birth certificate.

I think they were pretty confident they could ultimately slide by the issue. They almost got away with it.

But when the military officer filed his suit against Onada, there was no putting the genie back in the bottle. And now a judge has committed to hearing the case on “its merits”. It would seem the appropriate thing to do to clear the air once and for all. If Onada had nothing to hide he would be encouraging it.

Despite everything that’s been written and said from Onada and his camp, I have yet to see a Hawaii bureaucrat directly quoted on Onada’s citizenship qualification or the existence of an official Hawaiian birth certificate documenting Onadas birth place. None of the documents presented so far include an actual stamped birth certificate. It appears they may een be outright fakes, but I’ll leave that for others to determine. The bottom line is that Onada has yet to present any credible evidence that he meets the Constitutional requirement of having to be born on American soil to qualify as an American presidential candidate.

Does anyone have a different take?


134 posted on 07/26/2009 6:24:17 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: dools007
You said -- So The Marxist Onada continues to play now you see it, now you don’t with the birth certificate.

--

Well, Obama did swear an oath, at least -- 50 different times and places -- that he is fully qualified under the Constitution, to be in the Office of President of the United States. And as far as "getting away with it" I presume you mean still being in office. And if that's what you mean, yeah, he's still in office...

And then you were saying -- "The bottom line is that Onada has yet to present any credible evidence that he meets the Constitutional requirement of having to be born on American soil to qualify as an American presidential candidate."

--

Well, there is no legal requirement that a candidate produce his birth certificate. The Constitution says he *must* meet those qualifications, and he swears under oath that he does (and like I said, 50 different times for at least 50 places). This is the same thing done by all other candidates and they did not have a legal requirement to produce their birth certificates either.



http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1703




138 posted on 07/26/2009 9:45:57 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson