Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ejonesie22
Does grasping for last elections losers also include Mitt?
I'm not on a Romney bandwagon either.
But to answer your question, no.
Ronald Reagan was not considered a loser in 1976.
Only Ford and Dole were (and 1996 worked out real well for the GOP, too, didn't it?)
 
52 posted on 06/25/2009 3:57:01 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: counterpunch

That is what I thought...


53 posted on 06/25/2009 4:14:30 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: counterpunch
Ronald Reagan was not considered a loser in 1976.

Neither is Palin in 2008. You see the media still going after her, you see the crowds she's getting. Did Dan Quayle get roaring crowds after losing a presidential election? John Edwards? I didn't think so.

60 posted on 06/25/2009 5:49:10 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson