I think 2012 is a long way off. I don’t have a particular horse in the race at this time.
We just don’t know who is going to run or who is even going to be relevant. Think of all the Sanford supporters a week ago...
I do however think that regardless of what other candidates might be in the running, Palin would be a sure loser.
For whatever reason, Palin represents something to some people, just as 0bama represents something to others. But neither politician’s support comes from actual performance, abilities or leadership on the issues. And I do believe that 2012 will be all about those qualities, not the vacuous identity and personality politics of 2008. We will lose the debate if we put up someone as lightweight as 0bama. I believe 2012 will be the year the adults finally step forward and say “enough!”
Riiight...
If I did not know better I would simply credit that statement to ignorance about Palin's record, which is a redeemable situation for you.
However I know better.
Keep swinging...
Very curious then as to why you're concerned about a Governor who isn't even an officially-declared presidential candidate.
(For whatever reason, Palin represents something to some people, just as 0bama represents something to others.)
Its all about identifying with a candidate culturally. For example, take Romney. Many Freepers cannot identify with Romney because he is too urbane. Plus the fact that Romney tried to run to Ted Kennedy’s Left on social issues in the 1994 Senate race didn’t help either.
Many FReepers love Palin because they identify with her culturally. She’s a small town, redneck woman who hunts and chooses life for her children and grandchild. They connect with her culturally. To them, she is kin.
So yes, conservatives do practice identify politics.