here’s one I was trying to find:
COURIC: She’s not always responsive when she’s asked question and sometimes does slip back to her talking points. So it was a really interesting experience for mer to interview her yesterday.
RODRIGUEZ: Let’s see if that’s the case here, we have an excerpt where you ask her about her opinion on the bailout.
COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries? Allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy? Instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say, I like ever American I’m speaking with were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the tax payers looking to bailout.
But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up the economy– Helping the — Oh, it’s got to be about job creation too. Shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americas. A
And trade we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive scary thing. But 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. ALl those things under the umbrella of job creation.
This bailout is a part of that
Like I said before, nobody is perfect, and as I recall, by the time of the debate, she had been better prepared. But you have to admit, she is rambling all over the place.
parsy, who is providing you what you asked for.
Couric, again, is trying to trap Palin into suggesting she doesn’t want to help middle class families. The question starts off with a premise, and then proceeds with distracting details.
What a disgrace, Couric—and all of mainstream media for that matter.
I say there’s nothing of substance in this example that gives any credibility to your claim. If you disagree then go ahead, describe the deficit in her intelligence portrayed in this example. Be specific, because I will demand it if you are not.
So far, you’ve shown how desperate Couric was to trap Palin, and the response by Palin in which she sounds maybe a little distracted, but it demonstrates no particular intellectual deficits and you are unable to come up with any.
I would suggest you try to understand your own thoughts before pushing your political agenda in this forum.