Your post demonstrates ambivalence.
The motive for the first statement is contradicted by that of the rest of the post.
So far, you have not been able to support your comments about Palin. Don’t overlook the fact that you never will be able to do so, because you cannot present viable evidence that she is anything but smart.
I live in a quantum world where I accept little at face value. Its not ambivalence as much as it is uncertainty. Reality is what it is, and i have to accept it.I wish Palin was the new hope for conservatism and could hold her own in any debate. I just don’t see it right now. Honestly, could you watch that interview and not feel that Palin was out of her league?
parsy, who wishes he could be delusional