You will also note that the poster is a registered n00b, perhaps the author of the stealth deceit.
I posted this primer. The author joined FR at my invitation. He didn’t post it to deceive you. He absolutely does want to see Obama removed from office, which is clear in his discussion of quo warranto. The claim that he is only interested in legal precedent is false and possibly disingenuous.
Leo Donofrio did more to help the birther cause than anyone else, with the exception of Polarik, whose work I respect tremendously. Leo spent his own time and money preparing motion after motion for his case and Cort’s and took them all the way to the SCOTUS in his desire to see the usurper dethroned. To say that he doesn’t want Obama removed from office is utterly false and totally misrepresentative.
What have you or I (Polarik excluded) done to further this cause besides bitch on this forum? While the scope and intent of Stephen’s primer may not suit you personally, he should be commended for his effort to frame the issue for Obama supporters in a way that they can grasp. Birthers aren’t the intended audience. We’re already convinced! My family and friends, who think this issue is crazy, read this primer and finally get it. Now they’re getting involved. That’s progress.
I can appreciate being offended by the comment that the forgery is an interesting theory but is irrelevant. Polarik’s work is not theory and CERTAINLY not irrelevant, but attacking Stephen’s motive and accusing him of having ulterior motives isn’t fair or honest.
Damn, just damn!