Nor does your's.
But that was a nice try to mischaracterize: the court holding in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark states that Wong Kim Ark is a native born citizen.
And just where is the difference between native born and natural born outlined? In law or in the Constitution or in other Supreme Court decisions?
Finally you’re getting the point! ... A SCOTUS ruling on the definition of natural born citizen is needed as it applies to the Constitutional requirement for eligibility. Your desire to have native born mean the same thing as natural born does not remove the reality that a SCOTUS rendering is needed to settle the issue. But then, rational discussion isn’t what you come to these BC threads for anyway, by your own admission, so I don’t expect you’ll acknowledge a court ruling is needed where your affirmative action figure is the issue.