Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2

“... he’s legal(legally?) met the requirement as they exist.” I’m sorry, FRiend, but the thing he has even had his press secretary say was sent to him from Hawaiian official records is a forgery. So, technically, he is not only a criminal, he ain’t/hasn’t met the legal requirements.


97 posted on 06/16/2009 9:32:45 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
I'm not referring to the fraud of the birth certificate. That's obvious to whoever is honest about what's been presented before the public as the undeniable truth of Obama's origin.

I'm referring to how THIS little part of HRS 338 has NOT been successfully challenge in court:

“This copy serves as prima facia evidence

With that little caveat slipped in when the Certification of Live Birth was first used in November 2001, the SCOTUS and Congress has "blindly" accepted this document:

- OVER A MORE-DETAILED DOCUMENT LIKE THIS -

99 posted on 06/16/2009 9:44:14 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson