Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; Beckwith
NATURAL BORN is mentioned in case law:

“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.’ Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.”

147 posted on 06/17/2009 7:38:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
NATURAL BORN is mentioned in case law...

I would point out that Justice Waitie does not issue a definitive ruling on the natural born citizen definition, merely gives an opinion that some believe the matter is unresolved. Even if true, in any case the Ark decision came along 24 years later and put the matter to rest.

153 posted on 06/18/2009 4:07:31 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson